Freight brokers are on the front lines of maintaining a safe, efficient, and compliant transportation network. One of the most important responsibilities in the broker-carrier relationship is conducting thorough due diligence before assigning a shipment to a motor carrier.
As fraud continues to present challenges across the freight industry, relying on a carrier's provided information alone is not enough. Brokers should establish a consistent verification process and carefully review a carrier's authority, insurance, operating history, and other available information before tendering freight.
The following checklist highlights several warning signs that should receive additional attention during the carrier vetting process.
Is the carrier operating with inactive or revoked authority?
A carrier's operating authority should be verified before it is permitted to haul a shipment. An inactive or revoked authority status is a significant warning sign and should prompt further investigation.
Regularly verify the carrier's authority status through FMCSA resources and confirm that the information provided by the carrier matches the information on file.
A new carrier is not necessarily a bad carrier, but limited operating history requires additional due diligence.
When working with a carrier that has newly issued authority, brokers should take additional steps to verify the carrier and establish that the business is legitimate before tendering freight.
Consider the following:
New authority alone does not establish that a carrier is fraudulent. It simply means the broker should perform appropriate due diligence before moving forward.
Has the carrier changed insurance providers frequently?
Frequent changes in insurance coverage can warrant additional scrutiny. Brokers should verify that required insurance coverage is active and consistent with the carrier's information.
Insurance instability may indicate compliance or financial concerns, particularly when changes occur repeatedly or information provided by the carrier does not match available records.
Has the carrier recently changed its company name or ownership?
Frequent changes to a carrier's legal name, business identity, or ownership can make it more difficult to establish a clear operating history.
When these changes occur, brokers should review the carrier's history carefully and determine whether the changes are legitimate and properly documented.
A name or ownership change is not automatically evidence of fraud, but unexplained changes should receive additional attention during the vetting process.
Do the carrier's records match the information available through FMCSA?
Inconsistencies between information provided by a carrier and information in FMCSA records should never be ignored.
Verify key information such as:
When important details do not match, pause the onboarding or load assignment process until the discrepancy has been explained and verified.
Double brokering remains one of the industry's most significant fraud concerns.
Double brokering occurs when a carrier accepts a shipment and then improperly reassigns the freight to another carrier without authorization. This can create significant risks for brokers, shippers, carriers, and drivers.
Brokers should remain alert to information or behavior that could indicate a shipment is being transferred to another party without authorization.
Helpful safeguards include:
Is someone pressuring you to skip or shorten the vetting process?
A legitimate carrier should understand the importance of verification. Pressure to bypass normal procedures, provide information immediately, or ignore discrepancies should be treated as a warning sign.
Do not allow urgency surrounding a shipment to replace proper due diligence.
A consistent verification process helps prevent decisions from being made simply because someone is pushing for a load to move quickly.
Are there unresolved regulatory or financial penalties?
Outstanding fines or penalties may warrant additional investigation. They can indicate potential financial, regulatory, or operational concerns.
When applicable, ask for clarification regarding the nature of outstanding penalties and whether the carrier has taken steps to resolve them.
Are there repeated reports of deceptive or fraudulent behavior?
Negative feedback should not automatically disqualify a carrier, but repeated reports involving deceptive practices, double brokering, payment issues, or other serious concerns deserve attention.
Look for patterns rather than relying on a single review or isolated complaint. Consistent reports involving similar conduct can provide valuable information when evaluating a potential carrier relationship.
Do not provide sensitive pickup information until the carrier and driver have been properly verified.
One important safeguard is confirming the carrier's identity when the driver arrives for pickup. Verify the applicable DOT or MC information on the truck against the carrier information associated with the shipment before releasing sensitive pickup information.
A practical process includes:
Be cautious when driver information changes unexpectedly or repeatedly.
Last-minute driver changes can create operational and compliance concerns, particularly when the replacement information cannot be verified promptly.
A sudden driver change may result in:
Brokers should have a defined process for verifying replacement driver information before allowing a shipment to proceed.
A strong fraud prevention program begins with a consistent standard operating procedure.
Rather than treating each carrier verification as an individual decision, establish a documented process that identifies the information that must be reviewed before a carrier is approved.
The process should include step-by-step verification of relevant carrier information and supporting documents. Where appropriate, technology can also be used to streamline verification, maintain records, and identify discrepancies.
Most importantly, the same core verification standards should be applied consistently. A carrier should not receive a lower level of scrutiny simply because a shipment is time-sensitive.
Fraud prevention requires ongoing awareness.
Freight brokers, operations personnel, and other employees involved in carrier selection should understand the warning signs associated with fraudulent activity and stay informed about emerging threats across the transportation industry.
Regular training, industry education, and internal discussions can help employees recognize suspicious activity before it develops into a larger problem.
Fraud prevention is not limited to a single broker or carrier.
Building relationships with other transportation professionals and sharing information about emerging fraud patterns can help the industry identify new tactics and protect legitimate businesses.
When appropriate, document suspicious activity and share relevant information through legitimate industry and regulatory channels.
Carrier verification is one of the most important safeguards a freight broker can use to reduce fraud risk.
Checking authority status, reviewing insurance information, identifying inconsistencies, monitoring for double brokering, verifying drivers and equipment, and maintaining a consistent vetting process can help brokers identify potential problems before freight is placed at risk.
No single warning sign automatically proves that a carrier is fraudulent. The goal is to recognize patterns, investigate discrepancies, and avoid allowing urgency to override proper due diligence.
Staying vigilant, informed, and consistent is one of the strongest defenses against freight fraud and helps protect brokers, shippers, carriers, drivers, and the broader transportation industry.
Brake Safety Week 2021 is scheduled for August 22-28, highlighting the importance of proper commercial vehicle brake maintenance, inspection, and performance. Learn what CVSA inspectors will look for and how Abdi Transport Inc. recommends preparing vehicles before Brake Safety Week.
